Obama’s Raw Dictatorial Behavior

Obama’s Raw Dictatorial Behavior

This post does not bemoan Obama’s bathroom policy. That issue has received more than ample coverage. Rather, it asks why he is forcing this policy on the American people.

Answering that question requires that we deal with two preliminary issues. First, despite smarmy attempts to cloud the issue, make no mistake that he is forcing this policy on us. Though Obama’s bill is only a “suggestion,” those failing to take the hint get their educational funds turned off. Of course, the federal government has been playing this game for years, taking our money and then giving it back to us with strings attached, thus using this mechanism to control education and many other aspects of our lives. Obama’s bathroom diktat, however, represents the most blatant exercise of this power to date.

Identifying Obama’s motivation requires that we grasp this policy’s full implications. Some of them you have heard repeatedly, so I will not drag you through them again. Many Americans, however, are not familiar with other provisions. Ben Johnson in an article entitled, “The most dangerous, and underreported, part of Obama’s transgender edict,” divulges significant predominantly unknown aspects of Obama’s policy.

  • All a person needs to do to change gender is report to the school office that he feels like a different gender. He immediately must be treated according to the gender he chooses. He does not need to display any dress or behavioral characteristics of his newfound gender. In other words, a guy can continue to dress and act like a guy.
  • A person can change genders as often as he chooses. Combining this provision together with the one above means that a guy can report to the office the hour before girls’ gym class that he feels like a girl, and without making any other changes take a shower with the girls. Apart from restraining Christian convictions, how many guys would not take full advantage of that arrangement? In fact, it is difficult to imagine the office not being mobbed with guys feeling feminine before gym class.
  • On overnight field trips or athletic trips, a person claiming to be transgender will be housed in the same room with those of the opposite biological gender. No discrimination by school authorities is permitted. In addition, they are not allowed to inform roommates (or their parents) that someone of the opposite biological sex will be sleeping in the room with them. In fact, school authorities are not permitted to divulge the biological sex of anyone, so depending on how well a transgender boy disguises his sex, a girl may not be aware of it when she steps out of the shower.

This policy is bound to be the ruination of women’s athletics because if boys claiming to feel like girls are allowed on girls teams, frequently they will be the best players, resulting in girls’ teams being comprised predominantly of transgenders.

Why would Obama advance policies so insane and disruptive? Let me suggest some possibilities.

  • Obama has exposed his love for raw power in various ways. His pronouncement that he has a pen and a phone in effect asserted that he can and will function as a dictator and revealed that he enjoys that role. This mandate is about as dictatorial as it gets.
  • This policy strikes at the very heart of Christian culture. Sexual morality comprises one of its major elements, and this policy all but eradicates sexual morality. Obama has displayed hostility toward Christianity in numerous ways, and therefore he may be motivated to enact this policy in order to destroy it.
  • Related to the item above, Obama might also intend this edict to crush the spirit of Christians. If he can force your daughter to expose herself to any boy desiring to see her naked body, he has reduced you to a powerless, abject slave. Even for those Christians who have no daughters, the fact that Obama can exercise this level of raw power over Christian girls engenders in them a sense of total demoralization and absolute defeat.
  • Linked to that motive may be his demented desire to demean. His choice of John Kerry, the betrayer of our nation during the Vietnam era, as Secretary of State reveals this detestable aspect of his character. More recently, his appointment of Eric Fanning, an openly gay man, as Secretary of the Army, and Barbara Satin, a transgender to be a member of the president’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, provide other examples of his enjoyment of poking conservatives in the eye. His bathroom policy seems to be another manifestation of his joy in demeaning those of a different position.

So what is his motive? It may be all of the above. Whichever it might be, it comprises a display of raw, dictatorial power.

As Christians, what might we do? We can count on the Republican Congress to do nothing, just as they have with ObamaCare and virtually every other one of Obama’s dictatorial initiatives. The only solution resides in the evangelical church. I have written a book that I hope will appear on the Internet and bookstore shelves in a couple of months that provides a sure strategy for defeating the Left. It is my hope that evangelical Christians will read and apply it. If the church does not act now, it will soon be too late.

2 comments on “Obama’s Raw Dictatorial Behavior
  1. Paul Liebert says:

    Can anyone find a more stark example of emotion-based reality? This is the real agenda behind it all. Does Obama know what he is at the forefront of (for now, anyway)? I don’t know much about the guy personally so I couldn’t tell you, but there is no doubt in my mind that he is a pawn in a very big game.
    He’s quite an accomplished guy- as is Hillary. Whatever they do, promote, or move along in their use of power plays into a colossal shift in world view that is sweeping… well, the whole world! Objective reality is way down on the evolutionary chain that has led to where the human world is today. It’s sooooo… “19th century!”
    Emotion-based reality is the new order. If it feels right, it really is right. If the majority feel that it’s feeling right and should be promoted, then we, as a society, are going to just have to silence the dissenters.
    But, one might opine, the majority that dictates policy is not the majority at all– it’s an elite group of higher-echelon people who were chosen by the majority to make things better. As a whole, the culture wants emotion-based reality. There is only the little caveat that such a reality in the area of basic social structure is impossible to agree on. So we elect our champions to figure it out and tell us what to do. We really just want to be comfortable and live our plush life-style. As long as they don’t interfere with that we’ll be fine with whatever they decide.
    “What do I care about who goes in the bathroom with me, anyway?”
    We surely don’t want anyone to feel badly about their feelings! We’ll support whatever you feel– just don’t go around murdering anybody! (at least not in any direct sense).

  2. Blaine says:

    I came across this article with sermon online which pretty much describes what the President, The Dept. of Education, and the Dept. of Justice have now put around their necks.


    By Reverend David Whitney
    May 29, 2016

    I understand that new neck wear is being prepared for Obama in light of his administration’s actions on May 13th of this year. It is not a fancy silk neck tie, no nor is it an expensive gold chain, it is, well… Let’s let Jesus describe it. Turn to Matthew 18:6. Many people speculate about what Jesus would do, or what He would say, but in Obama’s case no speculation is necessary. We have in Jesus’ own words what He did say and continues to say, and it should cause the hair to stand on end.

    Video of the Sermon

    “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”

    A Message from Jesus to Obama – Matthew 18:6

    That word translated offend is the Greek word, “skandalizo” and it connotes, “to entrap, to put a stumbling block or impediment in the way, upon which another may trip and fall, to entice to sin, to cause a person to begin to distrust and desert one whom he ought to trust and obey to cause to fall away.”

    And surely the perverts in the bathroom who are given license to sin by this edict will entrap, put a stumbling block, entice to sin and cause children to distrust and desert those whom they ought to obey (namely the Almighty God whose Law is the Bible). Without a doubt it will cause children to fall away. So those who have issued this edict are themselves guilty of placing this stumbling block in the path of every child in America who currently attends the government run schools. Nothing could be more obvious than that Obama and all the officials at the Department of Education, and all those at the Department of Justice will also have this new neck wear as they are all guilty of this great crime against the children of these united States. Would to God that all parents of children would pull them immediately from the government run schools and homeschool themselves or place them in good Christian schools. It would be better for their children never again to set foot in these institutions now committed to their moral destruction.

    The hypocrite Obama’s two daughters attend private schools that will not be affected by this perverse proclamation.

    The Obama Justice and Education departments have declared that all public schools be required to institute gender-neutral bathrooms where boys can freely enter girls’ bathrooms and vice versa. Failure to comply threatens federal funding. But putting boys in girls’ bathrooms is NOT where the proclamation stops.

    Writing for National Review, David French reports, “The Department of Justice and the Department of Education have declared that they now ‘interpret’ federal law to not only support the fantastical notion that boys can become girls but also to impose new legal requirements that impact every aspect of school life. The administration’s letter sweeps far beyond bathrooms–imposing a new speech code on school employees and even students, opening girls’ showers to boys, requiring schools to allow boys to sleep in girls’ rooms on overnight field trips, requiring boys to room with girls even in single-sex dorms, and putting boys on girls’ sports teams.”

    ◾OBAMA’S NEW NECK WEAR:’But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea’-JESUS CHRIST


Have a comment?